{"id":3853,"date":"2015-04-24T14:42:12","date_gmt":"2015-04-24T14:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/?p=5782"},"modified":"2015-04-24T14:42:12","modified_gmt":"2015-04-24T14:42:12","slug":"la-plainte-en-matiere-dequite-salariale-de-lacaf-est-rejetee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/la-plainte-en-matiere-dequite-salariale-de-lacaf-est-rejetee\/","title":{"rendered":"La plainte en mati\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 salariale de l\u2019ACAF est rejet\u00e9e"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Un arbitre de la Commission des relations de travail dans la fonction publique a rejet\u00e9 la plainte en mati\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 salariale de l\u2019ACAF.<\/p>\n<p>Le processus d\u2019\u00e9valuation des plaintes comme la n\u00f4tre comporte quatre volets, et il incombe \u00e0 la partie plaignante, l\u2019ACAF en l\u2019occurrence, de produire une preuve suffisante qu\u2019un groupe a fait l\u2019objet de discrimination sur le plan de la disparit\u00e9 salariale.<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019arbitre estime que le t\u00e9moin expert de l\u2019ACAF n\u2019est pas satisfait au crit\u00e8re du fardeau de la preuve relativement au troisi\u00e8me volet du test qui portait sur le processus d\u2019\u00e9valuation des postes. L\u2019arbitre n\u2019est pas convaincu que l\u2019\u00e9valuation du t\u00e9moin expert \u00e9tait suffisante pour poursuivre le processus.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendue de vive voix \u00e0 l\u2019audience aujourd\u2019hui et une d\u00e9cision \u00e9crite suivra dans les prochaines semaines.<\/p>\n<p>Des renseignements plus d\u00e9taill\u00e9s seront communiqu\u00e9s une fois que l\u2019\u00e9quipe aura examin\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision \u00e9crite. Dans l\u2019intervalle, toute question devrait \u00eatre adress\u00e9e \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidente du Comit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 salariale de l\u2019ACAF, Nicole Bishop-Tempke (<a href=\"mailto:nbishoptempke@acfo-acaf.com\">nbishoptempke@acfo-acaf.com<\/a>) ou \u00e0 la conseill\u00e8re en relations de travail, Vivian Gates (<a href=\"mailto:vgates@acfo-acaf.com\">vgates@acfo-acaf.com<\/a>).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Un arbitre de la Commission des relations de travail dans la fonction publique a rejet\u00e9 la plainte en mati\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3853","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-parite-salariale"],"acf":{"categories":[48],"groups":false,"canBeFeatured":false},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3853"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3853\/revisions"}],"acf:term":[{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"category","href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/48"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.acfo-acaf.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}